Visualizzazione post con etichetta Politicization. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta Politicization. Mostra tutti i post

martedì 27 gennaio 2015

Schmitt as Comparative Lawyer


In questo articolo la teoria di Schmitt viene apprezzata più dal punto di vista del diritto comparato che della filosofia del
diritto, mostrando come tale chiave di lettura offra più possibilità interpretative, specie in relazione a Leo Strauss, da un lato, e al sorgere del realismo politico
americano di Morgenthau, dall'altro.


...Tutto ciò impica, ovviamente, un ritorno, attraverso della comparazione, del pensiero giuridico al pensiero del politico. Nel senso preciso per cui il maschile del termine italiano vuole tradurre il neutro del tedesco Das Politisch, con punto o alcun riferimento alla politica, e meno che mai alla mera questione del governo efficace del mondo, ma alla dimensione stessa dell’esistenza storica in quanto esistenza sospesa tra la possibilità dell’ auto-affermazione e dell’annichilimento.
Una tale ‘teoria del politico’, fondata sullo stato di eccezione, cessa quindi di essere una mera teoria della ‘decisione per la risolutezza’, come disse una volta Loewith,[1] e diviene invece la concreta rappresentazione di origini genealogiche, mantenute come principi legali di ordinamento....




[1] Cfr. K. Loewith, Marx, Weber, Schmitt, Laterza, Roma, 1994, p. 137.



Read More and Download it at Academia.edu

mercoledì 23 luglio 2014

Judges as an "Elite": The Case of Italy

Abstract:      


In the last decades, several factors have transformed the morphology of Italian legal system, so to create a perceptible different assess of the equilibrium among powers and formants and to mould, in a renovated way, the overall relationship between Law, Politics and Justice. The Italian judiciary (magistratura) has been re-organized along lines radically dissimilar to those followed in common law systems.
After examining all the data: the number of judges in office, the percentage of represented genders, the amount of cases and the overloading of the legal system, the aim of this paper is to show that a major characteristic of the legal professions in Italy is the almost complete lack of lateral movement among personnel. Career decisions must be made early; for example, applicants for the judiciary must be no more than thirty years of age. Promotion of judges, prosecutors, and state’s attorneys is largely dependent on seniority.
My theory is that the unwanted result of all this has been both a Judicialization of Italian Legal System and a politicization of the judiciary through the CSM as a peculiar Italian institution, re-defining the Italian Legal Style

Presented at the Proceedings of the International Academy of Comparative Law
this paper may be download at SSRN

mercoledì 8 gennaio 2014

Monateri on Cir vs Fininvest

L'autore contrasta la decisione della Cassazione sulla base di considerazioni generali. La principale della quali è il ritorno attuale alla pratica dello Judicare tamquan Deus dei Grandi Tribunali prima dell'avvento della modernità... more
Research Interests: 





sabato 28 dicembre 2013

Stasis in Moltmann e Schmitt

Stasis in Moltmann e Schmitt
Pier Giuseppe Monateri

NOW entered in top ten list ever for articles on Theology at ssrn.com


Abstract

The essay introduces an original interpretation of Moltmann’s thought on Christian kenosis, according to the fundamental critical method known as ‘close reading’. On this ground, the Author brings to the surface the complex bulk of literary quotations which give substance to a specific passage in Moltmann’s work “The Crucified God”. Quotations become an intellectual device apt to produce meaning through its proper deferral and suspension. Within this framework, the Author’s main purpose is to put at the centre of the scene the explicit reference made by Moltmann to C. Schmitt’s concept of stasis, in order to explain the self-emptying of God even in a political perspective, as a kind of internal battle within divinity. The theological canon (Christian kenosis as moulded by Moltmann) is conceptually linked to the political anti-canon (stasis and exception as defined by C. Schmitt). In this perspective the structural relationship between Theology and Politics, usually epitomized by the synthetic expression of ‘political theology’, comes to be re-substantiated.

Download: COSMO, 2013, at
http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/COSMO/article/view/443

Keyword

kenosis; stasis; Moltmann; Schmitt; political theology; close reading; interpretation; canon; anti-canon; quotation

Full Text


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

AddThis

Bookmark and Share